Grow your community and let your products shine!
Register | Login
Menu
Lightweight
Gogs is designed to be extremely lightweight and fast, running efficiently with minimal resource usage, which is ideal for personal projects or small teams.
Self-hosting
By allowing users to host their own Git service, Gogs provides greater control over data privacy and security, making it suitable for sensitive projects.
Cross-platform Support
Gogs can run on various operating systems including Windows, macOS, Linux, and ARM, offering flexible deployment options across different environments.
Easy Installation
The installation process for Gogs is straightforward and quick, with binaries and Docker images available for different platforms, reducing setup time.
Active Development
Gogs has an active open-source community and regular updates, ensuring new features, bug fixes, and improvements are continually being made.
Low Dependencies
Gogs has few dependencies, simplifying the installation and maintenance process by reducing potential compatibility issues.
Customizable
With a wide range of configuration options, Gogs allows users to tailor the platform to meet their specific needs.
Yeah, I’m actually doing that with Gitea: https://about.gitea.com/ Some people went with the forgejo fork: https://forgejo.org/ though Gitea itself was a fork of Gogs, if I remember correctly: https://gogs.io/ I also ran GitLab in the past: https://about.gitlab.com/ but keeping it updated and giving it enough resources for it to be happy was troublesome. There’s also GitBucket: https://gitbucket.github.io/ and…
– Source: Hacker News
/
4 months ago
> Gitea but the other one Wouldn’t that also be Gogs? https://gogs.io/ I remember when that one was what a lot of people were looking into, before the Gitea fork happened. It’s odd to see how this has happened yet again, but I guess is a good thing that it’s even possible in the first place, if there are indeed differing values and goals?
– Source: Hacker News
/
7 months ago
I did use https://gogs.io/ in the past. Was nice.
– Source: Hacker News
/
about 1 year ago
This reminds me of Gogs [0], where the original author refused a lot of good ideas and improvements, eventually leading to a fork [1] that’s now a lot more popular and active than the original. [0] https://gogs.io/ [1] https://gitea.io/en-us/.
– Source: Hacker News
/
over 1 year ago
To me I like the best GOGS https://gogs.io/. Same features like GitHub but all local and lightweight.
Source:
over 1 year ago
There’s a number of places out there, some of which also support alternatives to Git itself. By no means a complete list and in no particular order: GitLab – https://about.gitlab.com/ Sourcehut – https://sourcehut.org/ Codeberg – https://codeberg.org/ Launchpad – https://launchpad.net/ Debian Salsa – https://salsa.debian.org/public Pagure – https://pagure.io/pagure For self hsoted options, there’s these below…
– Source: Hacker News
/
over 1 year ago
Gogs is really easy to deploy and has a familiar UI.
Source:
over 1 year ago
GitHub is Microsoft’s privately owned service that provides hosting and other features for Git repositories. There are other services which provide comparable services: GitLab, BitBucket.. You can also self-host such a service (Gogs, Gitea..).
Source:
over 1 year ago
Gogs says it works on Pi. I’ve used it for a few clients that requested self-hosted repos and it’s very nice.
Source:
over 1 year ago
There was no drama as far as I recall, just complaints that he wasn’t agile enough or something like that. The different project is Gogs https://gogs.io/ and its author is Joe Chen (‘unknwon:).
– Source: Hacker News
/
almost 2 years ago
I don’t know if anyone remembers but Gitea is a fork of https://gogs.io/. If I’ve understood correctly they forked because the feeling was that Gogs wasn’t a true open source project.
Source:
almost 2 years ago
Is Gogs the way to go now? Or am I misreading this as a repeate of Audacity?
Source:
almost 2 years ago
Https://gogs.io/
Seems nice. Not sure how good it integrates with Jira. But has a built-in issue tracker and wiki.
Source:
almost 2 years ago
I found Gitlab a bit of a pain to configure, and went instead for a simple docker solution with: GoGs.
Source:
about 2 years ago
My experience with GitLab is that they accelerated very quickly in the beginning with a focus on new features. This made the whole ecosystem incredibly slow, and it’s unbearable for me to run as a service on my own hardware / cloud accounts. I guess that’s the problem with these open source services that also rely on paid platform income. I have tested out https://gogs.io/ and the difference in speed is just…
– Source: Hacker News
/
about 2 years ago
> I tend to install FOSS because imo they are more “future-proof”, but some of them are developed by companies (e.g., Fedora Linux) and that makes me wonder if they’re truly future-proof. The story of CentOS should be telling that, no, many pieces of software that are backed by a company will not be future-proof and will probably experience certain changes as a consequence of that, be it being transformed to…
– Source: Hacker News
/
over 2 years ago
Gitea or Gogs would work. You can set up users in both.
Source:
over 2 years ago
Gogs maybe? https://gogs.io/ Not sure if that’s exactly what you’re looking for. No idea if you can use it in docker. I used gogs for about a year and a half with zero problems.
Source:
over 2 years ago
I love gogs for the purpose. It’s very lightweight and easy to configure.
Source:
over 2 years ago
Check out gogs, very easy to install and ui is very similar to GitHub.
Source:
over 2 years ago
I have a gogs.io for a while, It’s nice chinese open source software and wrigthen with go language.
I looked at the documentations and they are very similar.
The deference is development and release of gitea and it’s Nice dark mode.
I have 1GB RAM and 1 vCPU for my personal use.
Source:
over 2 years ago
