This doesn’t sound right at all. Ubuntu itself doesn’t have an ESR package, only https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/firefox which is at 125. The Mozilla PPA does have an ESR package, but per https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa?field.series_filter=focal it’s at 115. has been supported since Firefox 98, meaning ESR 91 was the last release lacking it, and it reached end of support…

– Source: Hacker News
/
5 months ago

I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it’s used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you’re basically saying “The usual machine built this”. Which is good information, don’t get me wrong, but it’s much less secure than “John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this” So, you’re right, that GPG verifies…

– Source: Hacker News
/
8 months ago

You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that’s no official Mozilla repository.

– Source: Hacker News
/
8 months ago

As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I’m confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I’d have appreciated at least a mention in the article.

– Source: Hacker News
/
8 months ago

There’s also a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Though you’ll have to convince Ubuntu to prefer that instead of the snap. It’s not hard, certainly easier than installing Debian which is probably still what I should have done. I think I used this guide: https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-ubuntu-22-04 Though what that doesn’t tell you is that the snap…

– Source: Hacker News
/
10 months ago

Https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa A quick google will find plenty of sites telling you how to adjust the package versioning priorities to keep the MozillaTeam version of FF preferred over the crappy snap one. I still use Ubuntu desktop as my daily driver and server OS, and we have zero snaps installed on any of our systems.

– Source: Hacker News
/
11 months ago

They do offer the beta channel[1], if that’s not too edgy. 1: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-next.

– Source: Hacker News
/
11 months ago

On the other hand you may find large ecosystems revolving around their own dedicated hosting. Gnome and KDE both have their own self-hosted GitLab offerings. For Ubuntu related projects there’s Launchpad. Finally as has already been mentioned before GNU Savannah for GNU/FLOSS type projects. That said, having several logins to contribute is not quite ideal.

– Source: dev.to
/
12 months ago

On ubuntu this seems to be official (?) ppa: https://launchpad.net/~far2l-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Make sure “far2l-gui” is installed. On ArchLinux there’s package in AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/far2l-git (I maintain it). Don’t know details other distros.

– Source: Hacker News
/
about 1 year ago

If you’re using an Ubuntu based distro, then there is a PPA for both stable and latest nightly versions of Neovim.
Shell
Https://launchpad.net/~neovim-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/stable
Https://launchpad.net/~neovim-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/unstable

Then you will be able to install Neovim with apt install neovim.

Source:
about 1 year ago

I use the Firefox from the Ubuntu Mozilla Team’s PPA and I haven’t seen any crashes at all. https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa.

– Source: Hacker News
/
about 1 year ago

Turns out it was longer ago than I thought— way back in the Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04 days: https://launchpad.net/~mikepurvis/+archive/ubuntu/dpkg.

– Source: Hacker News
/
over 1 year ago

There’s a number of places out there, some of which also support alternatives to Git itself. By no means a complete list and in no particular order: GitLab – https://about.gitlab.com/ Sourcehut – https://sourcehut.org/ Codeberg – https://codeberg.org/ Launchpad – https://launchpad.net/ Debian Salsa – https://salsa.debian.org/public Pagure – https://pagure.io/pagure For self hsoted options, there’s these below…

– Source: Hacker News
/
over 1 year ago

– https://launchpad.net/~savoury1 – currently broken packages.

– Source: Hacker News
/
over 1 year ago

Not to be confused with Canonical’s launchpad developer portal.

Source:
over 1 year ago

PPAs are available for both stable (0.7.x)[1] and unstable (this 0.9)[2] versions. I use the latter and it has worked well for me. 1. https://launchpad.net/~neovim-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/stable.

– Source: Hacker News
/
over 1 year ago

Quite typical: Linux Mint, managed by apt with a third party repository [1]. On Mac I simply use the official installers from python.org. [1] https://launchpad.net/~deadsnakes/+archive/ubuntu/ppa.

– Source: Hacker News
/
over 1 year ago

> You can download Cheerp here. For Debian/Ubuntu, consider using our PPA > https://launchpad.net/~leaningtech-dev/+archive/ubuntu/cheerp-ppa They recommend using an Ubuntu PPA with Debian? That’s… Definitely a bold strategy. Let’s hope it works out for them. (I mean, given that they themselves suggest doing so, I take it that’s the PPA has been properly tested on Debian, and that they’ll answer support requests…

– Source: Hacker News
/
over 1 year ago

Well, I think /u/mikechant is correct that the whole release bump has more to do with availability of the ISO, than a whole slew of updates for installed systems. 22.04.2 will have 5.19 as the default kernel for install and that’s the big one. In the past, there’ve been updates to various gnome components, but I don’t know if they’re slated for the x.2 release. There’s nothing in the phased-update pipleline so…

Source:
over 1 year ago

They each have their own repos (pop-os’s apt.pop-os.org vs ubuntu’s launchpad.net) and manage their application releases individually.

Source:
over 1 year ago

Launch Pad : Maintained by Canonical, LaunchPad is particularly targeted at projects that run on Ubuntu. It provides hosting for more than 21,000 projects that use the Bazaar version control system.

– Source: dev.to
/
over 1 year ago